🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 655+ reviews
Outdoorβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Solo Stove mesa XL fire pit

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(655 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$55​
$91.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Smokeless tabletop fire pit for outdoor spaces

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Solo Stove mesa XL fire pit

Smokeless tabletop fire pit for outdoor spaces

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 11979

Category: Outdoor > Outdoor Heating & Cooking > Fire Pits

Original Price:$91.67 USD

Sale Price:$55 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5961 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
cherish this Solo Stove mesa XL fire pit!
the Solo Stove mesa XL fire pit feels solid and it meets expectations.
14 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
exceptionally nice Solo Stove mesa XL fire pit. No issues so far.
3 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless for my needs
In daily use, the Solo Stove mesa XL fire pit is practical which feels reasonable.
41 people found this helpful​
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
premium
For the price, the Solo Stove mesa XL fire pit does its job and I don’t regret it.
21 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
So far, the Solo Stove mesa XL fire pit is practical which is good enough. Works fine so far.
49 people found this helpful