🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 241+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Lululemon vintage Ball Cap

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(241 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$25
$41.67
Sale
βœ“ at no charge distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Brand recent with tags Size: L/XL

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy Shipping

↩️
basic Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Lululemon iconic Ball Cap

Brand latest with tags
Size: L/XL​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 118782

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Hats

Original Price:$41.67 USD

Sale Price:$25 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ gratis shipment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5003 reviews

CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
highly pleased​
So far, the Lululemon traditional Ball Cap feels okay so I’m okay with it. fulfillment was normal.
8 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premier Lululemon traditional Ball Cap ever
Honestly, the Lululemon traditional Ball Cap works as described and I don’t regret it.
17 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter
4 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable choice
Highly recommended Lululemon vintage Ball Cap! Already shared with my friends. Love the quality!
37 people found this helpful

AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable purchase​
Everything works as expected with the Lululemon vintage Ball Cap.
50 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Fantastic product
In daily use, the Lululemon retro Ball Cap is straightforward to use which is good enough.
21 people found this helpful