🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 863+ reviews
Vintage✓ In Stock🔥 Bestseller

Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts

★★★★★4.3 out of 5(863 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22
$36.67
Sale
✓ on the house dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

Lily of Beverly Hills VTG super high waist pleated printed shorts 6Waist: 13”Rise: 13.5”Inseam:7”

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment

↩️
effortless Returns

📋 Product Description

Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts

Lily of Beverly Hills VTG super high waist pleated printed shorts 6

Waist: 13”
Rise: 13.5”
Inseam:7”

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 342823

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price:$36.67 USD

Sale Price:$22 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

✓ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.3
★★★★★
Based on 8245 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · San Francisco, CA
★★★★★
Outstanding quality
Reliable daily use Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts.
21 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · San Francisco, CA
★★★★☆
extremely happy
In daily use, the Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts feels solid so it’s acceptable.
20 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King​
4 months ago · Charlotte, NC
★★★★★
Absolutely appreciate it
At first, the Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts is practical and I don’t regret it.
4 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · Fort Worth, TX
★★★★★
highly pleased​
For the price, the Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts does its job and it meets expectations. Nothing fancy.
47 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson ✓ Verified Purchase
2 months ago · Kansas City, MO

★★★★☆
Exactly what I needed
So far, it works fine and it works for me.
46 people found this helpful