๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 246+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Wooden rotating pendulum mantel clock

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.8 out of 5(246 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$18.5​
$30.83
Sale
โœ“ on the house dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Widen rotating pendulum mantel click

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt shipment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
effortless Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Wooden rotating pendulum mantel clock

Widen rotating pendulum mantel click​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 605619

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Clocks

Original Price:$30.83 USD

Sale Price:$18.5 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 7380 reviews

WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Aurora, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
A must-have​
The Wooden rotating pendulum mantel clock was functional to set up and start using.
43 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Memphis, TN

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Absolutely outstanding
Nice build quality Wooden rotating pendulum mantel clock.
50 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King
11 months ago ยท Fresno, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
outstanding choice
After certain use, it works fine which is good enough.
25 people found this helpful

TT
Thomas Taylor โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Detroit, MI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A+ quality
From my experience, the Wooden rotating pendulum mantel clock feels okay which is good enough. No setup issues.
27 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Detroit, MI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Five stars!
So far, the Wooden rotating pendulum mantel clock works well enough and it meets expectations. Works fine so far.
42 people found this helpful