๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.3/5 from 453+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Vintage pillsbury magnets

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.3 out of 5(453 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12.47
$20.78
Sale
โœ“ on the house dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Vintage boy and girls Pillbury Dough magnets. 1988.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt shipment

โ†ฉ๏ธ
effortless Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Vintage pillsbury magnets

Vintage boy and girls Pillbury Dough magnets. 1988.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 641452

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Salt & Pepper Shakers

Original Price:$20.78 USD

Sale Price:$12.47 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.3
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3408 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
fantastic quality
After a few days, the Vintage pillsbury magnets feels okay and it meets expectations.
10 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Tulsa, OK
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
top purchase ever
Not bad for the price.
11 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker โœ“ Verified Purchase​
7 months ago ยท Dallas, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exceptional quality
Personally, the Vintage pillsbury magnets is effortless to use so Iโ€™m okay with it.
48 people found this helpful​
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Columbus, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…​
Couldn't be happier
From my experience, the Vintage pillsbury magnets does its job so no complaints.
21 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young โœ“ Verified Purchase 
1 month ago ยท Minneapolis, MN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superior
I was a bit worried about quality, but the Vintage pillsbury magnets is acceptable.
29 people found this helpful