🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 488+ reviews
Menβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Polo shirt - woodsmoke

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(488 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20​
$33.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Collar : Polo shirtPockets : Chest pocketPattern : PlainArticle number : PI922O12T-O11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment

↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Polo shirt - woodsmoke

Collar : Polo shirt
Pockets : Chest pocket
Pattern : Plain
Article number : PI922O12T-O11​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 785739

Category: Men > Clothing > T-shirts & Polos

Original Price:$33.33 USD

Sale Price:$20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9129 reviews
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premier Polo shirt - woodsmoke ever
Really happy with the Polo shirt - woodsmoke. Using it almost every day now.
48 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly advise!
It’s not the premier product I’ve owned, but the Polo shirt - woodsmoke is decent.
30 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
Honestly, the Polo shirt - woodsmoke works as described which is good enough. Arrived on time.
43 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly satisfied
I was expecting less, honestly.
13 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
For the price, it works fine so it’s acceptable.
35 people found this helpful