🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 541+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Retro Fashion Letter Women's Sunglasses

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(541 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13.3​
$22.17
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

None

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Retro Fashion Letter Women's Sunglasses

None

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 979936

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price:$22.17 USD

Sale Price:$13.3 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4927 reviews
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding Retro Fashion Letter Women's Sunglasses!
The Retro Fashion Letter Women's Sunglasses arrived clean and undamaged.
5 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
In daily use, the Retro Fashion Letter Women's Sunglasses works well enough so it’s acceptable. No setup issues.
12 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
cherish it!
Personally, it performs as expected so it’s acceptable.
40 people found this helpful​
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really superb
To be fair, the Retro Fashion Letter Women's Sunglasses is effortless to use which is good enough. Works fine so far.
36 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb purchase
The Retro Fashion Letter Women's Sunglasses is effortless to use and clean.
50 people found this helpful