๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 204+ reviews
Womenโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Elegant Retro Women's Rose Alloy Hair Tie

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.2 out of 5(204 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$9​
$15
Sale
โœ“ no-cost delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

None

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
hasty Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Elegant Retro Women's Rose Alloy Hair Tie

None​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 981276

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price:$15 USD

Sale Price:$9 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3703 reviews
CL
Christopher Lee โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Las Vegas, NV
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
top decision​
So far, the Elegant Retro Women's Rose Alloy Hair Tie feels solid and Iโ€™m satisfied.
41 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท San Antonio, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
A must-have
For the price, the Elegant Retro Women's Rose Alloy Hair Tie does its job which is good enough. distribution was normal.
EY
Elizabeth Young โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Orlando, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
treasure love love!
After some use, the Elegant Retro Women's Rose Alloy Hair Tie feels solid so no complaints. Packaging was straightforward.
26 people found this helpful

RH
Ryan Hill
9 months ago ยท Aurora, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A+ quality
solid and good price Elegant Retro Women's Rose Alloy Hair Tie.​
24 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Columbus, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Fantastic product
After a few days, the Elegant Retro Women's Rose Alloy Hair Tie feels solid which feels reasonable. Nothing fancy.
49 people found this helpful