🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 937+ reviews
Homeβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Stanley Thermos

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(937 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$60
$100
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

MADE IN THE USA vintage unisex OG STANLEY

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment

↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Stanley Thermos

MADE IN THE USA
vintage unisex OG STANLEY​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Home products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1795834

Category: Home > Kitchen & Dining > Kitchen Drinkware

Original Price:$100 USD

Sale Price:$60 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6584 reviews

AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
extremely satisfied​
Personally, the Vintage Stanley Thermos works fine which feels reasonable. No setup issues.
27 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding Vintage Stanley Thermos!
After a few days, it does the job and it works for me. Works fine so far.
23 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent investment
The Vintage Stanley Thermos is practical and efficient.
18 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia
6 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really magnificent​
For the price, the Vintage Stanley Thermos is hassle-complimentary to use so no complaints.
26 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
ultimate Vintage Stanley Thermos ever
So far, the Vintage Stanley Thermos fits my needs so it’s acceptable.
2 people found this helpful