🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 716+ reviews
Electronicsβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Panasonic RX-CT800 Portable Boombox

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(716 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$100​
$166.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage Panasonic RX-CT800 portable boombox

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Panasonic RX-CT800 Portable Boombox

Vintage Panasonic RX-CT800 portable boombox​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Electronics products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1892445

Category: Electronics > Home Audio > Portable Stereos & Boomboxes

Original Price:$166.67 USD

Sale Price:$100 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2321 reviews

JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality​
Honestly, the Vintage Panasonic RX-CT800 Portable Boombox fits my needs so I’m okay with it.
14 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Dallas, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
Nice product overall Vintage Panasonic RX-CT800 Portable Boombox.
8 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· brand-new York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
premier decision
Overall, the Vintage Panasonic RX-CT800 Portable Boombox serves its purpose.
13 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
After a few days, the Vintage Panasonic RX-CT800 Portable Boombox feels solid and it meets expectations.
46 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
So far, it is practical so no complaints.
12 people found this helpful