🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 735+ reviews
Menβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Wacoal CW-X HZO699, size M

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(735 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$120.64​
$201.07
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Wacoal CW-X HZO699, size M.Unused.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Wacoal CW-X HZO699, size M

Wacoal CW-X HZO699, size M.

Unused.​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2387780

Category: Men > Athletic Apparel > Pants

Original Price:$201.07 USD

Sale Price:$120.64 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1935 reviews

DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent investment​
After several use, the Wacoal CW-X HZO699, size M works well enough so no complaints.
16 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Seattle, WA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous find!
After certain use, the Wacoal CW-X HZO699, size M is effortless to use and I’m satisfied.
24 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown
2 months ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
After certain use, the Wacoal CW-X HZO699, size M performs as expected so it’s acceptable.
45 people found this helpful

NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Really fantastic
To be fair, the Wacoal CW-X HZO699, size M does its job and I don’t regret it. Packaging was easy.
4 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly satisfied
For the price, the Wacoal CW-X HZO699, size M works as described so it’s acceptable.
23 people found this helpful