🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 424+ reviews
Beautyβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 3.4 oz

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(424 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$105
$175
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Brand newly-released fragrance, 3.4 oz.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
fast Shipping
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 3.4 oz

Brand latest fragrance, 3.4 oz.

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2493356

Category: Beauty > Fragrance > Men

Original Price:$175 USD

Sale Price:$105 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ complimentary dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9212 reviews
MW
Michelle Walker
3 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid in every way
Honestly, the Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 3.4 oz fits my needs and it’s fine overall.​
35 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply marvelous
Honestly, the Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 3.4 oz works fine and I don’t regret it. Packaging was straightforward.
8 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Impressed!
The Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 3.4 oz met my basic expectations.
27 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
’ve been using the Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 3.4 oz for a few days now and it’s been fine.
47 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Seattle, WA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
To be fair, the Lolita Lempicka Au Masculin 3.4 oz is effortless to use which is good enough. Works fine so far.
24 people found this helpful